Grammar mistakes that will destroy your reputation as a writer

Nowadays, being a writer is heavily advertised as the easiest of easy jobs. This couldn’t be further from the truth. Not only is our work scrutinised by dozens of pairs of eagle eyes, we are also faced with a specific set of irksome challenges that most nine-to-fivers are blissfully unaware of.

Perhaps the biggest challenge of these is attempting to present near-perfect work. True – an assignment will never be approved without first being proofread to within an inch of its life, but, if you have a habit of neglecting important grammar rules, you’ll soon find yourself twisting your thumbs more often than tapping at your keyboard. Here are the worst 14 grammar mistakes that will absolutely shatter your reputation as a writer.

Its and it’s

Having done a great deal of proofreading over the years, I can name this grammar mistake as the single most common of all time. Its and it’s are commonly confused even by native speakers. This is because, in the vast majority of words, ’s is used to indicate possession, like so:

  • The lizard’s tail snapped off.
  • Kate peeled off the book’s plastic cover.

BUT

  • James caught the lizard. Its tail snapped off.
  • Kate borrowed an old book from the library. She peeled off its plastic cover.

So, when do we use the ‘other’ one?

It’s (with an apostrophe!) is a contraction of It is or It has, like so:

  • It is raining.
  • It’s raining.
  • It has been ages since we caught up.
  • It’s been ages since we caught up.

Your, you’re and yours

Remember your primary teacher advising you to avoid contractions when writing? Well, using your and you’re incorrectly is probably one of the reasons. What’s more, if you’re self-editing (and I really don’t recommend it), there’s a high chance that you will probably miss this highly common but extremely irritating mistake.

So what’s the difference?

In short, while you’re is a contraction of you are, your is used to indicate possession. 

Your’s DOES NOT EXIST.

WRONG Where’s you’re toothbrush?

RIGHT Where’s your toothbrush?

WRONG Can you please tell me why your so angry?

RIGHT Can you please tell me why you’re so angry?

WRONG Is this dog your’s?

RIGHT Is this dog yours?

They’re, there, there’s and theirs

The English language is a tricky fellow, with homophones such as they’re vs there and there’s and theirs ensnaring many the unsuspecting writer. But using these words incorrectly is only forgivable in primary school. Here’s how they should be used:

They’re vs there

A good rule of thumb here is to figure out whether the word you want to use can correctly replace they are. If it can, then they’re is what you should be choosing.

WRONG     Matt’s eyes aren’t green. There blue.

RIGHT        Matt’s eyes aren’t green. They’re (they are) blue.

There is a preposition, i.e. it indicates where an object or person is. Remembering that there is the opposite of here might help.

WRONG      The line starts over they’re.

RIGHT         The line starts over there.

There’s vs theirs

Another instance where that tricky ‘s doesn’t indicate possession is there’s. As with it’s, the ‘s in this case once again indicates a contraction of there is or there has, where the apostrophe indicates the dropping of a letter/s. 

Contractions are especially used by native speakers for faster flowing English and, although not recommended for more formal writing, crop up fairly regularly in many articles and blogs.

Theirs, on the other hand, is used to indicate possession. The examples below clarify the difference:

  • This is wrong. There’s (There has) been a mistake.
  • There’s (There is) a new coffee shop in the piazza.
  • Remember Joan and Alan? That villa on the corner is theirs.

Who’s and whose

Any writer with a love for grammar has their pet peeves, and the incorrect use of who’s and whose is certainly one of mine.

You should be able to recognise a pattern by now. If not, let me explain succinctly:

Who’s is a contraction of who is or who has.

  • Who’s (Who is) at the door?
  • The professor is the only one who’s (who has) been to Japan.

Whose is used to indicate possession.

  • Whose drawing is this?
  • One of the parents whose children survived the accident gave an interview today.

Possessives and plural nouns

The ‘s continues to cause all sorts of problems even with possessives, which is its main use. Though most of us have mastered the ability of using ‘s correctly with singular possessive nouns, it seems that plural nouns are another matter entirely.

These sentences illustrate how ‘s is used correctly with singular nouns:

  • The student’s book fell open.
  • Paula pulled the donkey‘s tail.

No problem there. The prevailing difficulty, however, seems to arise with plurals that end with s – and most of them do. In this case, only the apostrophe should added at the end of the word. For some reason, a common error is to misplace the apostrophe. This may sometimes even be missed by proofreaders.

WRONG     There was a teacher‘s conference last Tuesday.

WRONG     A test assessing student‘s mathematical abilities was carried out.

RIGHT       There was a teachers’ conference last Tuesday.

RIGHT       A test assessing students’ mathematical abilities was carried out.

Who and whom

There seems to be an obvious lack of clarity about the use of who and whom in most of what I read and correct. Most writers, in fact, tend to steer clear of the ambiguity of whom. But there is really no need to do so.

The difference between who and whom is simple. It is the same as the difference between she and her, he and him, they and them, etc. This is because who (like he, she, they) is the subject (the person performing an action) while whom (like him, her, they) is the object (the person on whom the action is being done). 

Replacing who and whom with he or him is a simple way of deciding which one is correct.

  • Jack is the one who told me to apply.

(He told me to apply.)

  • The group of friends, one of whom has five children, went on a trip together.

(One of them has five children.)

To, two and too

No need to look so surprised. You may think that these three words are among the simplest in the English language, but the amount of mistakes relating to them is staggering, mainly because they are pronounced exactly the same. This may cause some writers to take them too much for granted, resulting in careless errors that put their reputation at risk. Luckily, they are fairly easy to understand. 

Two is a number. You will find that most style guides recommend writing in full the numbers 1-9, so, whether you are a writer or proofreader, you will rarely see the number two written as a digit.

  • These flower pots are gorgeous. I’ll take two.
  • I’m out of small change. Can you lend me two dollars?

Collins Dictionary gives several uses for the word too:

  1. i) to refer to an object or aspect referred to in a prior sentence.
  • It was nice to meet you, too.
  1. ii) for emphasis
  • The naughty little boy was spanked, and quite rightly, too.

iii) to indicate excess

  • Lisa has been staying out too late. 
  • It’s never too early to get your ears pierced.

To has two purposes:

  1. i) used with the infinitive form of the verb.
  • I’ll love to learn to ride a motorbike.
  • Zachary has gone outside to play.
  1. ii) used instead of towards
  • Don’t look now! He’s walking over to you.
  • I’d love a holiday this year. Let’s go to Hawaii.

Where and were

Where and were are another pair that is frequently muddled. Fortunately, sorting one from the other is relatively straightforward once you are clear on their exact meaning.

Where belongs to a set of what are known as interrogative adverbs whose main function is to formulate what are known as wh- questions. The word where in particular helps the speaker identify the position of a particular noun to the listener.

WRONG Were are you going?

RIGHT Where are you going?

WRONG Were where you last night?

RIGHT Where were you last night?

Were, on the other hand, is a verb. It is the past tense of are. Were is usually preceded by a noun or pronoun and followed by another verb.

WRONG The brothers where watching television.

RIGHT The brothers were watching television. 

Lose and loose

I can’t tell you how many times I’ve seen these two confused, and seeing both used incorrectly gives me actual heartache. The problem of switching between the two seems to lie in the oo, which gives people the impression of a long, drawn-out sound such as in pool. This gives rise to the misconception that the word lose (meaning to misplace something) takes a double o. Here are a few examples of how lose and loose are often spelt wrongly:

WRONG I always loose my sunglasses.

RIGHT I always lose my sunglasses.

WRONG These jeans are too big. The waist is too lose.

RIGHT These jeans are too big. The waist is too loose.

Then and than

Newsflash, writers: than cannot be interchanged with then.

Then is an adverb frequently used to indicate timelines, for example:

  • I met Dan for brunch, then caught up with Luke at dinner.
  • Tina did some shopping then caught the bus to Croydon.

Than, on the other hand, is a conjunction that is usually used for comparisons:

  • Australia is further from Malta than India is.
  • My house is a bit bigger than yours.

A useful trick that will help you make the correct choice is to remember that than is irreplaceable, while then can easily be substituted for synonyms such as subsequently, after that, etc.

Should’ve and could’ve

Because English speakers talk so quickly, the words should’ve and could’ve are often misheard (and consequently misspelt) as should of and could of. This is a gross error that can however be easily solved by remembering that ’ve is simple an abbreviation of have. In other words, should’ve and could’ve are contracted forms of should have and could have respectively.

WRONG It’s a shame the food here is so bad. We should of eaten somewhere else.

RIGHT It’s a shame the food here is so bad. We should’ve (should have) eaten somewhere else.

WRONG Why did you spend so much on that T-shirt when you could of bought it cheaper online?

RIGHT Why did you spend so much on that T-shirt when you could’ve (could have) bought it cheaper online?

Non-existent past participles

English is a rich language with many words and tenses. It has 17 different tenses, so no wonder we sometimes encounter difficulties! Two of the tenses that are often mistaken are the present perfect and the past perfect, which take either the present or past helping (or auxiliary verb) followed by the past participle, like so:

  • I have been to London twice. (present perfect)
  • Timothy dropped in on Sunday but everyone had gone out. (past perfect)

The main difficulty here appears to be the past participle, i.e. the verb following has/have/had. The past participle in regular verbs is easy to conjugate by simply adding -en, for example, eaten, driven, and written. There are several irregular verbs, though, that need to be learned off by heart, for example, gone, been, and had.

It seems that, sometimes, irregular verbs are mistakenly conjugated as regular ones, most especially got, which SHOULDN’T take an –en. The past participle of got remains got.

WRONG Where’s the measuring tape? I thought John had gotten it.

RIGHT Where’s the measuring tape? I thought John had got it.

A lot

One of the most ridiculous spelling errors ever to be made on this earth is a lot. Yes, that’s how it’s spelt. It is not one word. Allot means something else, and alot does not exist. Do we write afew or alittle? Exactly.

These sentences demonstrate how a lot (TWO WORDS) should be used:

  • It rained a lot yesterday.
  • Joseph made a lot of money from that property sale.

Comma splice

A comma splice is an extremely common mistake that is often overlooked because no one recognises that it is actually a mistake. It is a comma that is used between two independent clauses when a different punctuation mark, such as a colon, semicolon or fullstop should be used instead.

WRONG James is a great cook, his speciality is curry.

RIGHT James is a great cook; his speciality is curry.

WRONG I’d love to move to Sweden, the standard of living is really high.

RIGHT I’d love to move to Sweden. The standard of living is really high.

Hungry for more?

For these and more grammar tips, check out our comprehensive writing guides. Once you’ve mastered them, why not sign up as a writer and try them out?

Happy writing!

Posted in

About the author

Kylie Grech
Editorial Writer for TOPCONTENT.COM